Did GPT-6 Astra Really Crack A Napoleonic Cipher No One Could Read?

Napoleonic cipher letter from 1809 reportedly decoded by OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra for SentinelOne engineer Carter Church (Image: Shutterstock)
Napoleonic cipher letter from 1809 reportedly decoded by OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra for SentinelOne engineer Carter Church (Image: Shutterstock)

A SentinelOne engineer says OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra took about six hours to decode an 1809 cipher letter to one of Napoleon Bonaparte's generals, unread for 217 years.

Key Points:

  • Carter Church says the model worked from a single low-resolution scan and produced a full reading of about 1,300 cipher units.
  • The letter came from Napoleon's stepson on the emperor's orders and briefed Gen. Auguste de Marmont on troop positions before the war with Austria.
  • The result rests largely on Church's own account, and he says a specialist could have solved the cipher by hand decades ago.

GPT-6 Astra Cipher Break

Carter Church, an artificial intelligence engineer at the cybersecurity company, said this week he used the model to decrypt and transcribe the letter to Gen. Auguste de Marmont for the first time. He published the key, a transcription and a verification script on Sept. 18. Anyone can run the files to test his reading.

The letter holds 24 rows of two-digit numbers, stray letters and invented symbols, about 1,300 cipher units in all. Church wrote that the model worked from one low-resolution scan of a plate printed in a 1969 French military journal, building on 33 letter values that cryptology historian Daniel Tant had already documented.

The letter did not come from Napoleon directly. Eugène de Beauharnais, his stepson and viceroy of Italy, wrote it after the emperor ordered him on Mar. 16, 1809, to brief Marmont in cipher. It lists French and allied troop positions, reports Austrian movements and tells the general not to be intimidated by "a few troops or a gathering of rabble."

Also Read: Bitget Restores Protection Fund Above $300M As Withdrawals Resume

Carter Church Caveats

Church did not present the result as a feat of codebreaking. He wrote that a patient specialist could have done the work in 1970, and that the letter sat unread because no one qualified could justify spending weeks on a single document.

Five of the 155 signs remain unresolved, though Church says none alters the meaning.

The six-hour run time and the historical dating remain his own account, one review noted, and the work does not show that a model authenticated the document. Satoshi Tomokiyo, who maintains a catalog of unsolved historical ciphers, now lists the letter as solved, though his page cautions in general that listed documents may have been deciphered before.

The claim follows a similar one from earlier in September. Carter Leffen, a product development coach at Bloomberg, reported that the same model spent about 10 hours breaking a 1941 German Army Enigma message long listed as unsolved. Tomokiyo wrote in a September notice that he was receiving many solutions and had not caught up on recording them.

Read Next: Dogecoin Is Getting An App Layer After 12 Years Without One

Alexey Bondarev profile photo

Alexey Bondarev

Alexey Bondarev is Head of Content at Yellow.com. He specializes in in-depth Research and Learn pieces, with a focus on analytical reporting, industry context, and the bigger forces shaping crypto, from the AI era and security technologies to fintech innovation. He believes that everything digital will imminently overcome everything analogue and is working hard to make that come true.

Disclaimer and Risk Warning: The information provided in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and is based on the author's opinion. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Cryptocurrency assets are highly volatile and subject to high risk, including the risk of losing all or a substantial amount of your investment. Trading or holding crypto assets may not be suitable for all investors. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not represent the official policy or position of Yellow, its founders, or its executives. Always conduct your own thorough research (D.Y.O.R.) and consult a licensed financial professional before making any investment decision.
Latest News
Show All News
Did GPT-6 Astra Really Crack A Napoleonic Cipher No One Could Read? | Yellow