Claude Mythos AI Tops Rivals On Code Audits, Loses On 5X Price Tag

A blunt denial from the lab's chief executive followed claims it lobbied Washington to outlaw open-weight AI models. (Image: Shutterstock)
A blunt denial from the lab's chief executive followed claims it lobbied Washington to outlaw open-weight AI models. (Image: Shutterstock)

Anthropic's Mythos AI model leads rival systems at finding software vulnerabilities, but new independent benchmarks expose weaker judgment and steep running costs.

Mythos Preview Tops Source Code Audits

Offensive security firm XBOW confirmed the headline claim. The firm assembled a 10-expert team to evaluate the model across benchmarks, workflows, and integrations.

XBOW said Mythos Preview "presents a significant step up over all existing models, regardless of provider." Testers ran the model against frozen open-source applications with known vulnerabilities.

Mythos cut false negatives by 42% against Opus 4.6, with the reduction reaching 55% once the model received source code access, The Decoder reported. The model excelled at live-plus-source testing. It performed less reliably when given source code alone.

Also Read: XRP ETFs Hit Record $1.39B But Token Loses 4th Spot To BNB

Cost Question Tempers Anthropic's Edge

Anthropic has indicated Mythos Preview will be roughly 5 times more expensive than an Opus model, already among the priciest options on the market. That premium prompted XBOW to test whether a cheaper rival could match Mythos given more runtime.

The answer was yes. On a fixed token budget for web vulnerability discovery, Mythos beat Opus 4.6 but lost to OpenAI's GPT-5.5, which XBOW recorded at a 10% miss rate. XBOW noted the model "isn't terribly inefficient" if accuracy is the goal, but it is not best-in-class once cost normalization enters the picture.

The firm now recommends running a mix of models rather than relying on one.

Mythos AI Performance In Context

Mythos exhibited mixed judgment, rejecting false positives better than predecessors but sometimes discarding true ones when evidence failed to meet its formal criteria. Reverse engineering and native-code analysis ranked among its sharpest skills, with the model able to triage findings from competing systems.

Anthropic first unveiled Mythos in early April, restricting access to roughly 50 partners and framing the release as a step change in AI cyber capability. The U.K. AI Security Institute later said both Mythos and GPT-5.5 had "substantially exceeded" its accelerated forecast. The agency now estimates cyber capabilities double every 4.7 months, down from an earlier eight-month figure set in November 2025.

Read Next: Hyperliquid Rejects Wall Street's Manipulation Claims As HYPE Drops 14%

Alexey Bondarev profile photo

Alexey Bondarev

Alexey Bondarev is the Head of Content at Yellow.com, having reported on crypto for the last 10 years. He specializes in in-depth Research and Learn pieces, with a focus on analytical reporting, industry context, and the bigger forces shaping crypto, from the AI era and security technologies to fintech innovation. He believes that everything digital will imminently overcome everything analogue and is working hard to make that come true.

Disclaimer and Risk Warning: The information provided in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and is based on the author's opinion. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Cryptocurrency assets are highly volatile and subject to high risk, including the risk of losing all or a substantial amount of your investment. Trading or holding crypto assets may not be suitable for all investors. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not represent the official policy or position of Yellow, its founders, or its executives. Always conduct your own thorough research (D.Y.O.R.) and consult a licensed financial professional before making any investment decision.
Claude Mythos AI Tops Rivals On Code Audits, Loses On 5X Price Tag | Yellow