Cardano's latest technical upgrade has triggered an unprecedented debate about its founder's role, highlighting tensions between centralized leadership and decentralized governance in blockchain networks.
The platform has deployed Node 10.11, supporting the Chang #2 hard fork. This release marks Cardano's transition from technical bootstrapping to complete on-chain governance. However, attention has focused on community discord over Charles Hoskinson's continued influence.
Intersect MBO, a Cardano-led organization, implemented the upgrade on November 1. The release introduces critical governance features, including enhanced delegation mechanisms for Stake Pool Operators and new auto-abstain capabilities for Delegated Representatives (DReps).
"Following Chang #2, decisions will be shaped and voted on via fully decentralized governance," Intersect announced. The upgrade builds on September's Chang 1 release, which first enabled ADA token holders to participate in governance decisions.
The new framework requires token holders to delegate to a DRep to access staking rewards. "This mechanism ensures active participation in governance," notes a blockchain governance specialist at a leading digital assets firm.
However, the technical milestone has been overshadowed by controversy surrounding Mr Hoskinson. The founder's unusual decision to poll the community about his leadership has exposed deep divisions.
"Is Charles Hoskinson a cancer for Cardano?" Mr Hoskinson asked his social media followers. The poll has revealed a nearly even split, with 51 per cent supporting the founder and 49 per cent expressing criticism.
"The response reflects broader tensions in blockchain governance," observes a crypto governance researcher at a major investment bank. "Projects often struggle to balance founder influence with decentralization goals."
Market participants note that the controversy comes at a crucial juncture for Cardano. The platform's transition to fully decentralized governance represents a significant technical achievement, yet community cohesion appears strained.
Prominent ADA supporters have defended Mr Hoskinson, suggesting potential manipulation of poll results by automated accounts. However, the incident has sparked broader discussion about leadership in decentralized networks.
The upgrade mandates new participation requirements for token holders. Staking rewards will continue to accrue, but withdrawals now require either DRep delegation or explicit governance choices.
Industry observers suggest this episode highlights recurring challenges in blockchain governance. The balance between strong leadership and decentralized control remains a critical issue for maturing networks.