Quantum Test For Bitcoin Misleading? Google Scientist Slams 1 BTC Prize

Quantum Test For Bitcoin Misleading? Google Scientist Slams 1 BTC Prize

A Google quantum researcher has picked apart Project Eleven's 1 Bitcoin (BTC) Q-Day Prize, arguing the winning 15-bit attack proves far less than advertised.

Q-Day Prize Critique

In an Apr. 25 blog post, Craig Gidney, a research scientist on Google's quantum team, wrote that the contest was structured around a benchmark current quantum computers cannot meaningfully measure.

Project Eleven had awarded the bounty a day earlier to Giancarlo Lelli for deriving a 15-bit elliptic curve private key on cloud-accessible hardware, calling it a 512x jump from a prior 6-bit demonstration.

The group linked the result to long-term security assumptions behind Bitcoin, Ethereum (ETH), and more than $2.5 trillion in ECC-secured digital assets.

Gidney said he had declined an invitation to participate last year, viewing the premise as flawed. He noted that Shor's algorithm requires quantum error correction for cryptographically meaningful instances, and current machines hit roughly one error per thousand gates against billions required.

A more damaging objection followed. Gidney pointed to work by GitHub user Yuval Adam, who reportedly swapped the quantum calls with random calls and got results indistinguishable from the original.

Also Read: Monad Trades Near $0.031 As High-Performance EVM Chain Builds Its Case Against Ethereum

Project Eleven Response

Project Eleven CEO Alex Pruden defended the broader aim, saying resource requirements for such attacks keep dropping. He later acknowledged on X that small factoring problems are an imperfect yardstick for Q-Day, inviting feedback on better benchmarks.

The group cites recent estimates putting a full 256-bit attack at under 500,000 physical qubits, with a Caltech and Oratomic paper going as low as 10,000 qubits.

Gidney did not dismiss quantum risk, citing post-quantum migration work at Google and Cloudflare. The crypto industry has spent the past year debating defensive options, including Quantum Safe Bitcoin, Lightning Labs proposals, and BIP-361, which contemplates freezing roughly 6.9 million BTC sitting in wallets with exposed public keys.

Read Next: Katana's Sharp Decline Puts New Token Volatility Back In Focus

Disclaimer and Risk Warning: The information provided in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and is based on the author's opinion. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Cryptocurrency assets are highly volatile and subject to high risk, including the risk of losing all or a substantial amount of your investment. Trading or holding crypto assets may not be suitable for all investors. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not represent the official policy or position of Yellow, its founders, or its executives. Always conduct your own thorough research (D.Y.O.R.) and consult a licensed financial professional before making any investment decision.
Latest News
Show All News