Bitcoin treasury firm Twenty One Capital has moved 43,500 BTC into an escrow wallet days before its Dec. 9 public listing, triggering concerns about potential selling pressure as the cryptocurrency trades near $90,000. The transfer, worth approximately $4.5 billion, comes as the company founded by Jack Mallers faces a reported $1.5 billion unrealized loss on its holdings.
What Happened: Pre-IPO Transfer
Twenty One Capital shifted its entire Bitcoin position from third-party custody to a self-custody account as part of preparations for its New York Stock Exchange debut.
The company will trade under ticker symbol "XXI" following a Dec. 3 shareholder vote by CEP approving the business combination.
Mallers defended the transfer in public statements, describing it as a procedural requirement for the listing process. The firm updated its proof of reserves to maintain transparency during the transition.
The company, backed by Tether and SoftBank, positions itself as a direct competitor to Michael Saylor's Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) in the Bitcoin treasury space. Twenty One Capital plans to focus exclusively on Bitcoin-related ventures, offering equity market exposure to the asset through a capital-efficient accumulation strategy.
Also Read: Cardano's Hoskinson Says Quantum Threat Won't Hit Crypto Until 2030s
Why It Matters: Unrealized Losses
Market observers flagged the company's significant unrealized losses as a potential catalyst for selling pressure. Analyst OxNobler warned the $1.5 billion deficit could force liquidations that impact broader crypto markets.
Bitcoin dropped below $90,000 on Monday as uncertainty around the transfer spread through trading channels. The timing creates additional scrutiny for a company attempting to establish credibility in the competitive Bitcoin treasury sector.
The listing follows turbulent months for Mallers, who disclosed that JPMorgan Chase abruptly closed his personal accounts in September.
"Last month, J.P. Morgan Chase threw me out of the bank," Mallers said Nov. 23, noting the bank cited "concerning activity" under the Bank Secrecy Act without providing specific explanations.
Read Next: Prominent Early Bitcoin Adopter Exits Completely, Shifts to XRP Over Legal Standing