Ecosystem
Wallet

Binance Must Face US Jury Over Token Losses On EOS, TRX And Five Other Coins - Judge Kills Arbitration Defense

Binance Must Face US Jury Over Token Losses On EOS, TRX And Five Other Coins - Judge Kills Arbitration Defense

US District Judge Andrew Carter Jr. ruled that customers who lost money buying seven tokens on Binance - ELF, EOS, FUN, ICX, OMG, QSP, and TRX - can pursue their claims in open court rather than private arbitration, rejecting the exchange's key procedural defense in a lawsuit now in its sixth year.

The court found Binance never adequately notified users of an arbitration clause it added to its Terms of Use in February 2019, and that the class action waiver in those terms was too ambiguous to enforce. Binance called the remaining claims "meritless" and said it would vigorously defend them.

The plaintiffs allege Binance sold them unregistered securities without disclosing the "significant risks" required under federal and state securities laws, and are seeking to recoup what they paid.

All seven tokens in question experienced severe losses following their peak valuations during the 2017–2018 cycle. Founder and former CEO Changpeng Zhao is named as a co-defendant; his lawyers did not respond to a request for comment.

Why Arbitration Matters Here

Defendants in complex financial litigation often prefer arbitration to open-court proceedings for three reasons: hearings remain confidential, discovery is more limited, and costs are generally lower.

A ruling forcing this case into arbitration would have effectively shielded much of the proceeding from public scrutiny.

Carter found no evidence Binance announced the arbitration provision or directed users where to find it in their terms - a threshold the court considered necessary for the clause to bind existing customers.

The class action waiver failed separately because, while the 2019 terms included a heading referencing it, the body of the provision never detailed its terms, which the court read against Binance as the drafter.

Read also: XRP Bounces From $1.27 Panic Low But Key Resistance At $1.33 Threatens To Cap Any Recovery

Case History

The lawsuit originated in a wave of class actions against major crypto exchanges filed in April 2020. Carter dismissed it in 2022, but a federal appeals court reinstated it in 2024, ruling that US securities laws apply to Binance regardless of its lack of a domestic headquarters.

The Supreme Court declined to review that decision in January 2025. The SEC separately dropped its own enforcement case against Binance last May.

Zhao pleaded guilty to federal crimes in 2023 and was pardoned by President Trump in October 2025.

Read next: Former Mt. Gox CEO Tried To Rewrite Bitcoin's Code To Recover $5B In Stolen Funds - The Community Killed It In 17 Hours

Disclaimer and Risk Warning: The information provided in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and is based on the author's opinion. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Cryptocurrency assets are highly volatile and subject to high risk, including the risk of losing all or a substantial amount of your investment. Trading or holding crypto assets may not be suitable for all investors. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not represent the official policy or position of Yellow, its founders, or its executives. Always conduct your own thorough research (D.Y.O.R.) and consult a licensed financial professional before making any investment decision.
Latest News
Show All News